Indian Wells, CA—The protagonist was Roger Federer. The antagonist, at least in theory, was Filip Krajinovic. Let it be noted that Krajinovic was seeded 25th at this year’s BNP Paribas Open and ranked No. 28 in the world.
By the time this 58-minute encounter was over, as Krajinovic aimlessly shanked a forehand return wide, he might as well have been ranked 2,800. And yet, as sobering as it is to lose a tennis match 6-2, 6-1, it would be inaccurate to say Krajinovic had been destroyed or blown off the court.
After being broken in his opening service game, the 26-year-old Serbian had found a way to harness his herky-jerky style to level the match at 2-all. But the terms of competition in Roger Federer’s world are never those of combat. His is the argot of skills, a blissful distance from discord that is in large part the reason for his off-the-charts popularity everywhere he goes.
The likes of Rafael Nadal or Jimmy Connors made tennis personal, as violent as tennis could get. Not so with Federer. Let the others savagely battle. Federer serenely plays. This is why it’s difficult to regard his opponents as antagonists. They are, merely, truly, singularly, fellow ball-strikers. The eternal question versus Federer: Can you do it as well? What can you summon? And perhaps, in the spirit of inquiry that also makes Federer so likeable and distinct, he is competing, posing a question Nadal or Connors would ask in more raw terms about the man across the net: What’s he got?
Said Federer, “after four games you sort of get an idea what to expect.”
Match point from Federer vs. Krajinovic: