Serves lacked a bit of sting, as I typically have more success with something like the heavier VCORE PRO 97H. However, once I beefed the racquet up with a few grams of lead tape in the upper hoop, I was hitting penetrating serves with accuracy. I could change pace with topspin and slice serves quite effectively as well. All in all, there were few issues with starting points on my terms.
When the roles were reversed, the VCORE Pro was just about an ideal frame on the return of the serve. I could stand back (not as far back as Daniil Medvedev) and take a big rip at most serves, or stay on top of the baseline and rely on its forgiveness and maneuverability to return aggressively with a shorter stroke.
The stable and solid feel were also appreciated at net. While there is enough power to put the ball away, this racquet is more about control and touch on the volley than most of the other stiffer offerings in this category. The additional flex is particularly noticeable in the forecourt on soft angles, drop volleys and reflex half-volleys.
Overall, while the changes from the preceding models in the line are subtle, they are all in the right direction. This update should be an easy transition for prior users of this frame, but also worth a playtest if you’re looking at the EZONE or VCORE lines. And it’s a must-try for players who prefer a tweener frame with more of an emphasis on feel and control. In fact, my biggest complaint is that Yonex has now made it even more difficult to pick which of its 100s is best.