This year marks the 50th anniversary of TENNIS Magazine's founding in 1965. To commemorate the occasion, we'll look back each Thursday at one of the 50 moments that have defined the last half-century in our sport.
“Where were you?”
It’s the question we ask each other when we remember the world’s most historic moments. Tennis fans of this era have been treated to plenty of those moments, but none was quite as memorable, or as stunning, as Robin Soderling’s fourth-round win over Rafael Nadal at Roland Garros on May 31, 2009. If you were playing tennis that day, you probably remember it well: When the news came across, the earth shook a little at clubs and parks all over the world. Those were the aftershocks from Paris.
As London’s Daily Telegraph put it the following day: “The impossible happened on the red clay at Court Philippe Chatrier on Sunday.”
Looking back, it can be hard to understand what was so impossible about one man beating another in a tennis match. Yes, the 22-year-old Nadal was 31-0 at Roland Garros, had won four straight titles in his four trips there, and was well on his way to becoming the best ever on clay. Yes, he was No. 1 in the world at that time, had been dominant again on dirt that spring, and had destroyed former No. 1 Lleyton Hewitt two days earlier. No, Nadal had never been pushed to five sets in Paris, and none of his opponents, not even Roger Federer or Novak Djokovic, had come remotely close to finding a reliable solution to his muscular mix of power, speed, and consistency on clay.
Still, everyone loses sometime. Right?
Over the next six years, the legend of Soderling’s upset only grew. Now that we know Nadal would go on to win his next 39 matches at Roland Garros—he would suffer his second defeat there, to Novak Djokovic, this spring—we can better understand the richter-scale shock we felt that day in '09. How did the unheralded Swede, the 23rd seed, a man whom Nadal had routed 6-1, 6-0 three weeks earlier in Rome, do what no other man has been able to do?