Somewhere along the way tennis ceased to be thought of as a quintessentially American sport—it’s “international” now, for better and for worse, like swimming, cycling, track and field, soccer, and a dozen other games no one cares about here. Yes, tennis is played around the world, and no, it can’t match NASCAR’s regional homogeneity, but no country has a longer or stronger tennis tradition than the U.S. Tilden, Wills, Budge, Kramer, Gonzalez, Connolly, Gibson, King, Evert, Connors, McEnroe, Sampras, Agassi the Williams sisters—that’s a history.
If that list of champions is impressive to us, it must also be a little daunting for a young U.S. player. It’s a lot to live up to—in our minds, an American is supposed to be No. 1. Andy Roddick still can’t quite wrap his mind around the fact that he wasn’t able to continue the tradition of dominant No. 1 U.S. men begun by Connors and extended by Sampras. Fittingly, the first day of the U.S. Open offered a variety of examples of today’s U.S. players and how they’re measuring up to the tradition of excellence that hovers over them. I’ll start with the final, and most obvious, example and work back from there.
Venus and Serena Williams
At first, the idea of having the Williamses play back to back after a tribute to Althea Gibson seemed like overkill, something better reserved for an exhibition. But it ended up having a unique appeal—put together, they make for a star-studded evening. And they were a bracing tonic after the ahistorical feel-good singalong of “Respect." The Williamses walked out one by one and showed, as they have for 10 years, what it really takes to get respect in tennis (and pretty much anywhere else): a harsh and overt dedication to destroying their opponents. Last night Venus looked good—fresh and eager, she hit a 129 m.p.h serve—in continuing that tradition, while Serena struggled against a surprisingly game lefty from Germany named Angelique Kerber. Serena was bottled up most of the night in a dress with a bow, and earrings that could have been taken off a muffler service-award plaque; she finally ripped the bow away (I hope the poor designer wasn’t watching) and put Kerber away.
Donald Young
The Williamses are the embodiment of the U.S. tennis tradition at this point. Two years ago, it was thought that Young would become the male version. A smooth and talented black kid trained by his parents, he was the No. 1 junior in the world at 15. He earned a wildcard into the Open in 2005, was leveled by a journeyman in straight sets, and went into a year-long tailspin, eventually losing the first 11 matches of his pro career.
Yesterday, DY was back in the same spot, on the same court, against another journeyman, 6-foot-7 Aussie Chris Guccione. This time he was ready for the Show. Young was very good in every department. He returned Guccione’s serve with ease, placing it at the big guy’s feet, followed those returns up with impressively pinpoint passes, and made a few ridiculous gets off Guccione’s volleys.
OK, Young’s defense has never been a problem; it’s his offensive weapons that have been questioned, and he's still undersized by pro standards. But his serve is now a respectable, Nadal-like, 115 m.p.h., and he can pounce on a short ball with his forehand as quickly as anyone in the game. But you got a sense that Guiccone, a serve-and-volleyer, was the right guy for DY to play because (a) he gave him a target to hit past at net, and (b) he didn’t force Young to create or play much offense. Now the American gets Richard Gasquet, which is an intriguing match-up of former golden boys who have taken their knocks on tour. This time Young will have to slug it out from the baseline and create openings against a quick and talented shot-maker. By the end, we may have a better idea of what this particular future of U.S. tennis holds.
Alex Kuznetsov
Young has always been a media darling; Kuznetsov, on the other hand, while also a hotshot U.S. junior in his day (he lost to Gael Monfils in the French a few years ago), has labored in side-court obscurity since turning pro in 2004. The 20-year-old Ukrainian turned Pennsylvanian has never been ranked higher than No. 158 (he’s currently No. 186) and had to rely on a wild card from the USTA for his spot in this event, and a first-round match-up with talented wild man Nicolas Almagro of Spain.
Kuznetsov, small at 6-foot-0, 168 pounds, is the definition of workmanlike. He plays straight-ahead, north-south, power-baseline tennis without a lot of flash or angle. Sweating profusely under his baseball hat and walking with a forward hunch, he makes tennis look like hard damn work. Almagro was clearly the better—the more casually varied and creative—player from the beginning, but Kuznetsov would not give in. He managed to scratch his way into a tiebreaker in the third set.