Having held off the field to win a record eighth title at Wimbledon, Roger Federer delved into some of the reasons why he and the other members of the Big Four aren't getting more competition from up-and-coming players.
All of the men's top five—Andy Murray, Rafael Nadal, Federer, Novak Djokovic and Stan Wawrinka—are now older than 30, and the youngest Slam champion on the ATP tour is 28 years old.
Federer returned this season from a knee injury and is now among the oldest players to win a Grand Slam.
"Every generation is different. Since my generation and Rafa’s generation, yes, the next one hasn’t been strong enough to push all of us out," he said at a press conference the morning following his win at Wimbledon. "That's been helpful for us to stick around.
"But I also do believe that [the] way the points system is structured, and all the big points really only starting from the semis on—a young guy, if he wants to make a breakthrough, he can beat me, or any top player, but if he doesn't make a run to the finals or win a tournament, he's not really making any move in the rankings.
"And that also has a part to do with it, because as a young player, it's not that easy to win five straight matches.”
Several years ago, when the ATP Masters 1000, 500 and 250-level events were introduced, the ATP rankings were changed so that points approximately doubled per round and per tournament level—a bigger jump than the previous system. Grand Slam winners get 2,000 points, the highest amount offered.
"What I feel is a bit wrong in the ranking system—let's say at the Grand Slam level, if you have a great run playing the quarters, like Andy did,” Federer said. “For instance, he fought, he did, he [got beaten by Sam Querrey] in five sets—walks away with 360 points, and I walk away with 2,000 points. I just feel like the gap's too big. It's only been like this since a few years."