by Pete Bodo
Mornin'. This will be a brief one, folks, because I'm working on an exclusive story most of you will be very interested in come tomorrow. Be warned, though, but it has nothing to do with doping. Reviewing the comments (and I'm sorry I couldn't answer many of the questions put to me) just reinforced my conviction that the doping subject is a hall of mirrors. Broken ones. You see everything both reflected and distorted there. But you can always find one panel that shows you exactly what you hope to see.
This morning, I was chatting with Barbara Travers of the ITF, who read both my post and the comments on the Rochus allegations. She asked me to inform those readers who don't know that the ITF has a page(s) on its website dedicated to the anti-doping effort; you can peruse all the details at your leisure here.
We just finished a podcast on the Fed Cup, which will be up shortly, and wrapped it up with a brief discussion about the Rochus allegations. In the course of our conversation, I mentioned one fact that I want to share here. Most doping allegations grow out of observation of a player's performance or physique, but I have to ask you—did anyone on earth suspect the most high-profile and unequivocally guilty doper busted so far of using PEDs? Of course, I'm speaking of roley-poley Mariano Puerta. Funny, he was the most successful cheater (a three-time ATP tournament winner and former French Open finalist).
So much for trial by bicep...
Those of you who know and love our Portuguese friend and frequent correspondent Miguel Seabra might be interested in some comments he made on my last post speculating on Caroline Wozniacki's future. (Relax, this is not doping related, but I'm sure someone will start trying to visually measure her calf muscles and begin jumping to conclusions.)
Anyway, Miguel thinks Wozniacki's forehand is prone to failure, and he followed his message on the subject (unfortunately, I can no longer retrieve that email on this computer; maybe he can re-post that original criticism in the comments below) with these further thoughts on the state of WTA forehands:
Besides the 'forehand fail' epidemic based on bad technique, another big problem in women's tennis today is poor movement to the forehand side—thus making shaky forehands look even worse.
Here's a list of Top 100 regulars whose forehands are technically inferior to their backhands:
—Caroline Wozniacki
—Victoria Azarenka
—Shahar Peer
—Nadia Petrova
—Maria Sharapova
—Andrea Petkovic
—Agnes Szavay
—Vera Dushevina (who used to be Douchevina until someone advised her to change to Dushevina some years ago...)
—Bethanie Mattek-Sands
—Dinara Safina
—Alizé Cornet
—Katerina Bondarenko
—Monica Niculescu
Some of them, like Andrea Petkovic and Alizé Cornet, claim the forehand as their favorite shot. But in their case, they have extreme grips and really need time to prepare their forehands—when rushed, they don't look that good at all.
Of course, there are several players who also have a slightly/clearly better backhand than forehand, but still have a good balance between both shots because the forehand does not look that bad. Examples:
—Jelena Jankovic
—Flavia Penetta
—Daniela Hantuchova