Since I last checked the world’s newspapers Friday morning, the general feeling about the 2012 Olympics appears to have done a 180. Leave it to a really, really long opening ceremony to silence the doubters and kvetchers. Danny Boyle’s epic wiped away, at least for the moment, those drab concerns over traffic jams, rookie bus drivers, and money not well spent.
Or, as the Sun put it:
OLYMPIC OPENING CEREMONY IS FLAMING FANTASTIC
The flame part was pretty fantastic, as were the fiery rings, as was the sight of eight tennis players carrying their nation’s flags into the stadium—Novak Djokovic’s obvious pride and joy was a highlight. As for the rest of the ceremony...I know I’m in the minority, so I’ll just say that you maybe you had to be there; or maybe you had to be British; or maybe you had to be into those kinds of things. If only the country’s finest export, the Rolling Stones, had been there to give us a rude jolt at the end. Somehow, according to Mick, the boys “weren’t ready.” Was 50 years of playing together not enough?
As I said, though, I’m in the minority. Here’s what our friend Simon Barnes had to say about Boyle's prodcution, and the tone it set, in the Times:
"At the exact centre of the world last night, London turned down the option to celebrate giants and supermen and power and might and chose instead to celebrate people. It was on this fine and not unexpected note that the Olympic Games began—a Games fit for humanity, a Games that might stress joy rather than triumphalism."
I''ll go with that for now.
As for the tennis, the coverage in the papers has been overshadowed by other sports so far—the men’s gymnastic team in Britain, the men’s swimming and women's gymnastics in the United States. I like seeing tennis players take their places alongside the world’s athletes; the downside is that it leaves us with fewer over-the-top headlines to round up here.
As for the matches themselves, see my Racquet Reaction on Roger Federer's second-round win over Julien Benneteau here.