WIMBLEDON, England—Yesterday we witnessed what happens in the London tabloids when British players lose. The reaction is, shall we say, strong. As in: “This country is bloody useless” strong. But what's the response like if the locals defy their uselessness and play better than expected? Surely those same reporters and headline writers won’t go overboard in the other direction, just because the U.K.’s Laura Robson has won a match at Wimbledon, right?
The Times* sets the tone with its sober, restrained assessment of the 19-year-old’s win over Maria Kirilenko:
ROBSON STUNS GALLERY WITH DESTRUCTION OF NO. 10 SEED
The Guardian* keeps its head as well, refusing to read anything into one match:
ROBSON TIPPED FOR TOP AFTER TURNING ON POWER TO RESTORE BRITISH PRIDE
“After Robson’s impressive 6-3, 6-4 victory,”* writes Owen Gibson, “the last British woman to win Wimbledon, Virginia Wade, said the 19-year-old could go on to do “something incredible” at this year’s tournament, and Pat Cash immediately predicted she would go on to become a Top 5 player."*
The Telegraph* also knows that a single match doesn’t make a career:
ROBSON’S SWEET VICTORY HAS MILESTONE FEEL
Even David Cameron was following the news from Wimbledon yesterday*
The measured response continues elsewhere:
In the Independent*...
ROBSON’S WONDER WIN SPARES BRIT BLUSHES AT WIMBLEDON
In theMail*...
SEED SLAYER LAURA
Robson claims yet another top scalp in quick-fire victory*
In the Sun*...
TELL LAURA WE LOVE HER
Laura Robson brought Court 1 to its feet—and British tennis off its knees*
In the Mirror*...
ROBSON QUEEN
The nation’s bright hope reigns on Court No. 1*
Though the latter tabloid does sound something of a sour note with another, seemingly laudatory headline:
GIRL IN A BILLION
“The LTA,”* writes Neil McLeman, “spent nearly 1 billion pounds during the 19-year-old’s lifetime to find a Wimbledon champion.”*
Hmmm, I think I’ll take absurd overreaction over that demoralizing reality check.