Jh

Over the last couple of weeks at TENNIS Magazine, we’ve been putting together our 2007 season in review issue. It wasn’t hard to come up with the men’s match of the year. We had plenty of legitimate choices, from the Wimbledon final to Djokovic-Stepanek at the Open. The women, however, were a struggle. Serena-Shahar at the Aussie Open? Serena-Justine in Key Biscayne? Well, it took until the very last day of the season, but the women finally gave us a match of the year on Sunday in Madrid.

It was between the woman who began the year at No. 1, Maria Sharapova, and the woman who ended it in that spot, Justine Henin. One too tall, the other too short (is there a body type for women tennis players, the way there is for men? Steffi Graf’s is the one that comes to mind first), they nevertheless dominated the year-end championships and looked ready for an epic collision right from the start.

Sharapova was amped up even more than normal. She took more time between points, contorted her face more violently after winning them, and was in perpetual mini-fist-pump mode all night—they’re starting to look like nervous tics. She more than held her own for about 3 hours and 15 minutes, then lost it for the last 10. As she was in the 2006 U.S. Open final, Sharapova was successful at the (deceptively) simple task of thwarting Henin by hitting deep and largely down the middle. This kept Henin from attacking the way she wants to (loves to, needs to), and led her to overhit more often than usual.

Other than that, Sharapova’s serve was not a problem. She hit it to her targets and moved it around. I only noticed one shaky moment, at 3-3 in the first, when her toss went way to the left; but she still got the serve in. It was interesting to hear her hitting partner, Michael Joyce, tell her after the first set to use her kick out wide in the ad court because Henin was standing “too far back.” I wonder if Henin will use that information in the future.

Joyce also reassured Sharapova that she was “tougher than her.” He appeared to be sincere, and you could see why. Sharapova was in a fighting mood, and it was good to see her show some of her trademark will power. At 5-5 in the first, she went down 0-30, then went for the lines and nailed them to come back and hold. At 6-5, she had seven set points, lost them all, but stayed positive enough to earn an eighth and win it. At the beginning of the third, Sharapova went down 1-3 and looked tired. But she rallied one more time to even it at 3-3. While she couldn’t sustain that rally, she forced Henin, more than anyone has in months, to earn her title. You may not find Sharapova aesthetically—or sonically—appealing, or you may think she indulges in too many extracurricular activities. But at her best, the women’s tour still needs her competitive fury—Sharapova never goes through the motions. It’s no accident that she was half of the best women’s match of the year.

As for the other half, it looked to me like Henin won this one because she’s built up a reservoir a calm confidence in herself over the last 20-odd matches, all of which have been victories. Joyce wasn’t wrong. Sharapova was strong; but Henin seemed, despite many shaky moments (the usual “perils of Justine”), to not quite believe deep down that she could lose.

You could say that she eventually won with persistence—Henin overhit and overhit and overhit until the ball finally started going in. She double-faulted four times in getting broken to lose the first set, and it wasn’t until 4-4 in the second, with Sharapova closing in on the title, that Henin got a nose in front when she broke her (then she was broken right back). Much of the time Henin was trying to claw out of the box that Sharapova had her in behind the baseline. But as I said, the confidence she’s gained from her months at the top was there when she absolutely needed it. Henin found her way into the net at the right times, and got Sharapova stretched and scrambling by snapping forehands to each corner. I’d even say Henin’s attack-at-all-times mentality has helped her invent a shot. It's the run-through forehand: She doesn’t stop to get set up for her swing before she’s off and running to the net.

One shot crystallized Henin’s performance for me. Serving at 5-6 in the first, she put a nervous, tentative forehand into the net to give Sharapova a set point. On the next ball, after looking even more tentative on her serve, she got another forehand. This time, with no hint of hesitation or nerves, she rared back and drilled it as fiercely as possible into the corner for a winner. A brave shot. She’s had a long run of them this year.

Advertising

Ms

Ms

The women are done. The men have their last go-round this week in Shanghai. (I wrote a preview at ESPN.com a few days ago, which I’m reprinting below.) The tournament has already begun, with no major surprises so far: Nadal fighting, Gasquet showing some flashes but losing, and Djokovic looking like he may still have a U.S. Open hangover.

Last year’s Masters Cup was an entertaining event, with the top guys lifting each other’s games each day in hard-fought three setters. Let’s hope the rarefied atmosphere has the same effect this time around. After all the scandals circling the sport, it will be nice to get back to basics and remember what makes the sport worth watching. We've got TENNIS Magazine editor Tom Perrotta blogging from there this week.

Preview: Masters Pieces

The tours can't win.

Just as they're staging their big-money year-end championships -- the top eight women are in Madrid right now and the top eight men face off in Shanghai next week -- the tennis headlines are filled with scandal. There's match-fixing on the men's side, cocaine on the women's, and now possible poisoning in Davis Cup.

Who says this game isn't exciting?

Let's leave the juicy stuff behind and concentrate on the men's finale for now. No other event squeezes so much high-quality tennis into a single week. The heady atmosphere typically brings out the best in the boys. Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal staged the fiercest contest of their rivalry last year in the semis here. What can we expect from each player next week?

Roger Federer: He is 22-2 in the Masters Cup, with three titles, including last year's. His group consists of Fernando Gonzalez, Andy Roddick and Nikolay Davydenko. Federer's combined record against these three is 34-1. I think he's going to make the semis.

Rafael Nadal: The top seed in the other group has Novak Djokovic, David Ferrer and Richard Gasquet. Nadal lost to Djokovic twice on hard courts this year and went down to Ferrer at the U.S. Open. But the Spaniard got his act together in Paris last week and will want to prove that he, rather than Djokovic, is the real No. 2.

Novak Djokovic: He has looked a little burned out this fall, but he's saved his best for the big tournaments in 2007, having reached at least the semifinals of the last three majors. Whatever happens against Nadal, you have to like him against Ferrer and Gasquet.

Nikolay Davydenko: The Russian might not know which end of the court is up by now. Since being mentioned in connection with a possible match-fixing scheme, he's been scolded not just by the ATP, but by a chair umpire in Paris. He may just want the season to end at this point.

Andy Roddick: There have been rumors about Roddick skipping this event to keep himself healthy for the Davis Cup final. He's in the draw for now, with Federer, Davydenko and Gonzalez. Fed aside, this is as good a spot as any for him. Roddick hasn't lost a set to Davydenko in four matches and has won four of the last five times against Gonzo.

David Ferrer: It's nice to see the no-frills Spanish grinder rewarded with his first appearance in Shanghai. He's played a lot of tennis this year, but that's just what he does. The relatively quick indoor surface won't be to his liking, but he beat both Nadal and Gasquet, two of his round-robin opponents, the last time they played.

Fernando Gonzalez: A year that started so promisingly -- yes, it was this year that he reached the Australian Open -- turned into a long, up-and-down slog over the last 10 months. Gonzo wasn't happy in Paris, where he did his best to blow his spot here.

Richard Gasquet: A surprise participant, Gasquet snuck in with a solid fall. It's good for the game to have this young Frenchman representing the elite. Successful or not, he'll bring his distinctive style to the tournament. Let's hope it's something build on.

Semfinals: Federer def. Djokovic; Nadal def. Roddick

Final: Federer defeats Nadal