Every generation has its nominee for an award that is distinguished, but also frustrating: The best player to have not won a Grand Slam singles title. When it comes to men’s tennis, 2013 Roland Garros runner-up David Ferrer was most recently the worthy candidate of the ‘10s. In the ‘90s, consider Todd Martin, finalist at the ’94 Australian Open and ’99 US Open. In the wood racquet days of the ‘60s and ‘70s, one-time Slam finalists Dennis Ralston and Tom Okker contended for this honor.
Head to the ‘00s and ponder the skills of David Nalbandian. Armed with forceful groundstrokes off both sides, this Argentine hit the tennis radar in his teens. In the 1998 US Open junior final, the 16-year-old Nalbandian defeated the highly touted Roger Federer. Nalbandian’s mastery over Federer continued in the pros, as he won their first five ATP matches. In 2002, Nalbandian went all the way to the finals of Wimbledon. A year later, at the US Open, Nalbandian beat Federer in the round of 16 and lost in the semis to eventual champion Andy Roddick after holding a match point. At the ’05 Tennis Masters Cup, Nalbandian took the title, rallying from two sets to love down to beat Federer in a fifth-set tiebreaker. By the end of ’06, he’d reached the semis or better at all four majors.
But perhaps the greatest stretch of Nalbandian’s career came over a three-week period in the fall of 2007. Ranked as high as three in the world in March 2006, Nalbandian subsequently went into a tailspin. By October 2007, he’d slipped to 25 and arrived to play the Mutua Madrid Open having reached only one quarterfinal all year long.
Though Madrid now takes place in the spring on clay, in those days it was played on an indoor hard court. Nalbandian commenced his week with fine tennis, beating two superb players who reached Grand Slam singles finals, Arnaud Clement and Tomas Berdych. Then came a victory over his fellow Argentine, Juan Martin del Potro, who two years later would win the US Open.