These are just a few of the many things I’ve learned while playing tennis this year. The list could go on.
Don told me what it was like to go to Lew Hoad’s camp as a kid and see the great man play. “He was older then,” Don said, “but he was just ripping the ball.”
Liz spent the summer updating me on her torturous journey through Roberto Bolaño's epic novel 2666. It was worth it, she said, in the end: "There's one point when the story finally becomes clear, and you're like, 'Wow, he really is good.'"
Another day Ed let me know how bittersweet it felt, as he turned 75, to still be playing as well as he had at 55. “There aren’t many guys left who still come out here now,” he said sadly of his peer group. Then, seeing the upside, he flashed a smile: “But I can beat a lot of them now that I could never beat when we were younger.”
In the self-help 1970s, tennis was celebrated for its inner game. Playing it was a way to get in touch with your deepest self. And that made sense: When you’re on court, you spend the vast majority of time alone with your thoughts. In 2015, though, tennis seems to me to be more notable for what its outer game can do for us. At a time when so much socializing takes place at a distance, through email and Facebook and texts and tweets sent and read from halfway around the globe, the tennis court closes that distance and brings us face to face again.
This isn’t an aspect of the game that’s typically extolled, or promoted, or even mentioned. We play tennis, we’re told, to compete, test ourselves, and learn a skill; to exercise, lose weight, and relieve stress. We play this individual sport, in other words, for individualistic reasons.
But there’s evidence that the biggest benefit we get from tennis comes from its social element—from the bonds we form while we play it, and the beers we have with our opponents and partners when we’re done. For many of us, the courts are one of the few places where we can leave the demands of work and family life for a few hours and interact with people in an environment where a little less is at stake.
The paradoxical fact is that the (faux) competition involved in tennis offers a brief respite from the (real) competition of everyday life. As Timothy Gallwey, author of the Inner Game of Tennis, says, “It’s a sport where, for a few hours, we pretend that what happens to a yellow ball matters, even though we know all along that it’s just going to go back in the can when we’re done.” Yes, you compete against your opponent, but its the cooperation that counts for more. In a match, opponents work together to make the experience worthwhile, and, hopefully, bring out the best in each other. The cliché says that “winning is everything,” but the person we want across the net isn’t someone we’re going to beat every time; it’s someone who is going to “give us a good match.”
Experts say that the key to making the most of tennis’ cooperative benefits is to keep the socializing going even when the ball is back in the can. The beers afterward, or the once-a-month dinner, or the breakfast gathering to watch the Wimbledon final, or the Saturday BBQ at your club, are just as essential for our well-being as the match itself. In the past, of course, tennis clubs have represented exclusivity, and for much of the 20th century the sport was held back by its reputation as an upper-crust preserve. But as someone who plays it in the (hopefully) less exclusive 21st century, and who lives in a big city, the tennis club can feel like the small town I left behind. It doesn’t provide exclusivity; it provides a relief from anonymity.