When all is said and done—and after last night’s trio of age-defying triumphs, who can possibly say when that might be—the Australian Open will go down as the most significant tennis tournament Roger Federer ever played. Not this year’s Australian Open in particular, although if Federer goes on to win his 18th career Grand Slam singles title in Melbourne on Sunday, the case could certainly be made. That’s how unlikely a championship appeared as Federer—who is playing his first tour event since last July—entered 2017, and how impressive his run has been during this fortnight.

I’m referring to the Australian Open’s impact on Federer’s career. He’ll always be identified with Wimbledon, having won his first major there, along with six more. It was also the scene of his most painful defeat. Federer’s five consecutive U.S. Open titles—an achievement which, somehow, I feel is overlooked—also warrants mentioning. But Federer and Oz have had a connection like no other event he’s played.

It was where Federer began his reign as his sport’s best in 2004; it was, in 2006 and 2007, where we witnessed his elegant efficiency at its most refined. His loss to Novak Djokovic there in 2008 was stop-the-presses news, one of the biggest upsets in the last decade; his loss to Rafael Nadal there the following year, along with his tearful runner-up speech, will forever be a part of tennis lore. He won the title for the fourth time in 2010, part of an 11-year stretch of semifinal showings or better at Melbourne Park. At no other Slam has Federer achieved such a display of longevity and excellence.

Advertising

Roger Federer makes more history in Oz with five-set win over Wawrinka

Roger Federer makes more history in Oz with five-set win over Wawrinka

Those two words came to mind after watching Federer’s latest memorable performance Down Under, at 35 years of age and over five sets, against sometimes-nemesis Stan Wawrinka. Federer won the first two sets in confident and at times commanding fashion, but he couldn’t keep his lethal compatriot down for much longer. In the third and fourth sets, any short ball or average serve was sent back at what looked like double the speed, and Federer’s two-set advantage was quickly erased. Wawrinka was making Federer look his age, and it would take a bit of magic for the crowd favorite to prevent a sixth consecutive semifinal loss at the Aussie Open.

That’s just what happened, after Federer navigated out of trouble in the decider. He never lost serve in the fifth set but was stringently tested early on; it reminded me of the fifth set of the 2007 Wimbledon final, against Nadal. In that match, Nadal made inroads on Federer after beginning the fifth set with momentum, but he could never seize the opportunity to make the set his own. Federer’s pressure-defying focus and execution similarly kept this match from getting away from him, when at times it looked like it would. When Wawrinka’s bombardment finally began to wane, an opportunity came.

Federer took it, starting with an untimely Wawrinka double fault on break point. He then served out the match without difficulty for a 7-5, 6-3, 1-6, 4-6, 6-3 win. (Federer is now 16-0 against Wawrinka on hard courts, and 70-0 at the Australian Open when winning the first two sets.) It was seemingly just as surprising to Federer as it was everyone else, as he revealed in a wide-ranging chat with Jim Courier:

Advertising

And so the latest chapter of Federer’s storybook relationship with the Australian Open is approaching its climax. On Sunday, against either Grigor Dimitrov or—of course—Nadal, Federer will have a chance to win was many thought was unrealistic, an 18th Slam. Given the stakes, it will be incredible theater no matter the opponent, but considering Federer’s history with Nadal, the Aussie Open would be a fitting venue for these longtime rivals to renew acquaintances. (Be sure to watch to the video for Federer’s recollection of a meeting Nadal this off-season, when both were on the mend.)

Some thought the Australian Open might be the start of Federer’s farewell tour. If he wins on Sunday, it will be the start of a victory tour unlike any we’ve seen in tennis.