!IlAt 9:00 A.M., before keyboards start clicking and gossip starts twisting up and down the rows of desks, two sounds can be heard outside an empty Indian Wells press room. First, you hear birds singing, likely asking each other when all of these humans—players, coaches, ushers, writers—are going to leave them in peace. Second, you hear the springy, thudding pop of a tennis ball being hit. It echoes all around the main stadium. Together they make for a soothing soundtrack for the tournament. Even when the grounds are filled, the chirps and pops can be heard underneath the chatter of thousands of people.

Call it the hum of the tennis universe. Out of it shoot a million other little sights and sounds that give a tournament its texture. While television gives you a nice view and lets you watch in slouching comfort, it can't match the invigorating surprises you find on the courts. Before the desks around me fill up, here are a few of the sights and sounds that have stuck in my memory.

“Come on!”
I haven’t written anything about Caroline Wozniacki yet, though she’s looked extremely competent so far and will be hard to beat. I watched her up close last night on Court 2 against Jie Zheng. They played a brisk match, the kind where a single rally might inspire three different people around you to whisper, “wow,” “amazing,” and “holy…” before it’s over. What impressed me most was Wozniacki’s defense. Many times Zheng hit what looked like a sure winner only to see the ball find its way back over the net. From close range, Wozniacki is a bigger and more physical player than she appears to be on TV, or from afar. There's an energy to her game that doesn’t translate to the big screen.

There’s also a testy nerve in Wozniacki, and it was touched by Zheng’s frustratingly sharp hitting—is there a player other than Zheng who hits as many shots that appear to be going into the net, but which ultimately sneak over it? She controlled one key rally in the middle of the second set, sending Wozniacki scrambling all over the place. Ultimately Zheng, unable to find an opening, hit a screaming forehand wide. Wozniacki let loose with a fist-pump and an in-your-face “Come on!” worthy, very nearly, of Lleyton Hewitt. Then she looked across the net at Zheng. Like Roger Federer, it pays to watch Caroline Wozniacki up close.

Pow!
This Batman-inspired word is the only one I can think of to describe the sound of Andy Murray’s serve as it went off inside center court last night. By now, Murray has settled happily into his role as a risk-averse defender, a very fancy wallboard. Watching him set up shop behind the baseline, you get the feeling that it’s impossible for him to miss. But like Andy Roddick, he succeeds with this style because he can punctuate that defense with free points on his serve. For every winner his opponent comes up with, Murray can answer with an ace or an unreturnable—the combination typically tilts a match’s risk-reward balance in his favor. From an entertainment perspective, his serve is the place where Murray, who is a deceptively strong 6-foot-3, can show off the explosiveness that’s latent in the rest of his game. No matter how many times he belts it, it still comes as a surprise.

Pow 2!
Nicolas Almagro’s backhand is the most glittering bauble in tennis, and purely ornamental—the guy just doesn’t get the most out of his formidable ball-striking gifts. I can remember seeing him hit that full-loop one-hander for the first time back in 2004 or so and thinking, "This guy is going to be huge." The trouble is, as with so many shot-makers, because Almagro can haul off on a gasp-inducing backhand at any time, he tries to do it at any time. Still, whatever its ultimate value, the sport would be poorer without the shot, tennis’ guiltiest pleasure.

Advertising

Cw

Cw

“Vamos!”
This came from the mouth of Rafael Nadal, of course, after he snapped off one of many passing shot winners yesterday against John Isner. The big American seemed awed by Rafa in his presser later, especially his passes. He’s right: They have to be the best since Borg. Accuracy is an underappreciated virtue in tennis; it's lumped under the gneral heading of “pushing.” And it's true, as impressive as it is to be able to hit the ball to the same place over the over, it’s by definition monotonous. Not so with the pass, as Nadal showed yesterday when, in the first set, he broke Isner with a well-measured forehand up the line that was pinpoint enough to escape the long arm of the American; and, in the third set, he helped seal the win with a running crosscourt forehand that landed smack on the far sideline. The purpose and the glory of the passing shot: To give accuracy its due, to make it exciting. “That was something I just, you know, I wasn’t thinking too clearly out there.”
These were the words of John Isner after his loss to Nadal on Wednesday, when asked about what it's like to volley against Rafa. He wasn’t answering the question directly; it had triggered another thought, about a tactical mistake that he was just realizing he had made. As he answered, he dropped his head down so we couldn’t see his face under his stained University of Georgia baseball hat.

“I was hitting my forehand well and I was kind of content just trying to outforehand him. I should have made the points shorter. I should have made him come up with [passes] more often.”

A rare moment: Seeing and hearing a player’s thought process as it's happening.

Slick Ivan
How do you like Ivan Ljubicic with a Slick Watts-style headband wrapped around his sweating dome? The new look is helping, as he has had a nice run in Indian Wells. He beat Novak Djokovic yesterday and faces Juan Monaco today. Ljubicic, who turns 31 on Friday, is serious and intelligent—a man not a boy. I was oddly touched in the lunchroom the other day by how engrossed he was in his countryman Mario Ancic’s match against Nadal on TV. Normally, the players cast a glance at the match that’s on and go about their business.

I admit, though, that I’ve never taken to Ljubicic’s tennis. To me, the seriousness and gravitas that’s so appealing off the court combine to rob his game of joy and flair on it. This morning, though, when I walked out of the press room to hear the pops and the chirps a little more clearly, I caught Ljubicic starting his warm up. Headband already solidly in place, he began by jogging slowly around the perimeter of the court. The veteran needs to do everything he can to keep up with opponents 10 years younger than he is.

A walk through a tennis tournament, where kids barely out of their teens run and swing with frightening skill and power and ease, can seem like a vision of eternal youth. Its illusory, of course, as the sight of the over-30 Ljubicic limbering up on a hot morning, for the millionth time, made clear. It wasn’t as spectacular as an Andy Murray serve or a Nicolas Almagro backhand, but I may have liked watching Ljubicic jog even more. If he isn't joyous in his play, he's cheerful in his diligence. The sight of talent on display is impressive, yes, but the sight of persistence gets us closer to the truth.