MELBOURNE—Remember when one of the Big Four was guaranteed to win the men's title at a major? Or when Serena Williams was a lock for the women’s crown and you just sat back to watch some great, if slightly predictable, tennis?
Now, all that’s for the history books. We have entered a new and slightly perplexing age of chaos. As the first week of the Australian Open came to a close, the player’s restaurant and media center at Melbourne Park was populated with experts who looked at you blankly if you dared ask what was going on.
Fourteen-that's 14—American women had lost in the first round and a man rejoicing in the name of Tennys Sandgren had emerged as the lone American survivor in the men’s singles in the fourth round. Jack Sock? John Isner? Sam Querrey? Ryan Harrison? Gone.
But it wasn’t just American upsets that were causing headlines. Wimbledon champion Garbine Muguruza fell in the second round to Su-Wei Hsieh, also a Wimbledon champion—but in doubles. During her stellar doubles years, Hsieh was coached by Paul McNamee, who twice won the Wimbledon doubles title himself and had much to do with Su-Wei’s growth as a person and player. Hsieh finished last year 96 in singles but wrong-footed Muguruza with so many sudden, slashing, under-cut forehand drop shots that she won 7-6, 6-4.
Hsieh then bamboozled Agnieszka Radwanska, a former world No. 2 and semifinalist here two years ago, 6-2, 7-5, to reach the quarterfinals. It was more undercut forehand drop shots and great movement. Hsieh’s funny, engaging on-court chat at the end of the match reminded one a little of the former champion, Li Na. Even at 32, there is still time for Su-Wei to turn into a big crowd favorite.