2006_08_28_young_a

Okay, let’s start things off with a confession; covering my “home” Grand Slam (I’m both an American and a New Yorker) just doesn’t feel the same. Roll out of bed, go to the hardware store and get shelf-liner, wait for the babysitter to show up, jump in the car and fight the traffic on the Long Island Expressway. . . it feels less like I’m going to a major tennis tournament than. . . ugh. . . work.

I mean, there’s no good way to get my mean or mellow on, no fighting with the waiter in the stinky white shirt whose cigarette ashes fall in my café crème as he delivers it, no melodious song from the Kookaburra bird, no BBC newscaster’s soothing voice to put me to sleep while I’m waiting for the kettle to come to a boil in the flat (this is a feat, too, because those kettles come to a boil faster than Marat Safin after he shanks a forehand).

So how am I supposed to produce a gin blossom of nose of the U.S. Open when it feels like I’m just another New York (reverse) commuter, showing up at the desk?

Granted, that changed some as I strolled past the Unisphere and fountain here at Flushing Meadow
Park and saw Arthur Ashe Stadium looming in the distance. It’s a terrific piece of architecture, actually. It’s not as industrial as the post-industrial, modernistic site of the Australian Open, which looks some coal-fired power plant somewhere deep in the Ukraine, after a bunch of art lovers managed to get it converted into an art museum. But it’s also not as precious as Wimbledon (enough with the hydrangeas and weak-chinned aristos already!) and it has an imposing, nearly majestic quality that Roland Garros lacks.

The sight of the stadium got me a little fired up, and then of course there’s that statue of the buck-nekkid dude, poised in his serving motion (modeled on Ashe’s own, although Arthur preferred to play while dressed, usually in his trademark tighty-whitey shorts).And instead of clutching a racquet, nekkid dude got just the suggestion of a handle (it looks like a twisted cigar, but who am I to draw Freudian inferences?). Guess they couldn’t sell the naming rights to Prince, or Wilson, and just told the artist, “Hold off on the racquet. Can we bring down the price a little that way?"

So far so good, I thought. Now I just hope some of these poor American stiffs trying to crawl out from under the long shadows cast by Andre Agassi, Pete Sampras, Chris Evert, Jim Courier et al can keep it together and win a few matches in their – our – national championships.

In the early action, we had a split. Vania King took out Alicia Molik, but Donald Young floundered and fell apart after taking the first set from Novak Djokovic. I went around to The Donald’s – whoops, wrong guy - Young's interview to check out the state of his maturity, because the state of his game was dodgy at best.

I have to confess, my heart goes out to this kid. He’s got twin diamond earrings, make-a-statement black-and-yellow Nike duds, and that little, pencil-thin mustache that I’m more accustomed to seeing on brothers in Memphis, dressed in sharkskin suits and alligator shoes, with gold stick-pins under their neckties. Young’s got a sneaky little smile that’s half-planted on his face most of the time. And he’s extremely literal, which I always find charming (articulate people leave too little to the imagination), because I associate it (prehaps mistakenly) with innocence.

Abstraction? Who needs it!

Advertising

2006_08_28_young_b

2006_08_28_young_b

Here’s a fairly typical presser exchange with Young on the podium:

Q: You had a couple of breakpoints at 2?4 in the second set and another breakpoint at 3?5 in the second. If you had been able to consolidate one of those breaks, get the second set back on serve, do you believe the outcome would have been different?

A: Would have been a little closer score line, I think. I don't know how the outcome would have been because, you know, it didn't happen.  But, yeah, maybe I would have held or maybe I would have got broken. Hopefully, I would have held if I would have, you know, broken him, but I didn't.

Now come on, don’t you just love that?

The down side in this, unfortunately, is innocence + youth (he’s 17) = high out-to-lunch quotient. This is an easy formula to apply to Young. You just get the sense, listening to or talking with him, that he doesn’t have the shrewdness of a young Andy Roddick (callow as he was, he always knew where the bone is buried), and that it’s going to take Donald a lot longer to figure out the lay of the land than it did, oh, James Blake.

That’s okay, in a way, because I’ve always felt that despite his prodigy and amazing junior results, he’s got earmarks of a late bloomer – both physically, and emotionally. The down side, of course, is that winning and losing are habits and frames of mind. If you get used to getting pushed away from the food bowl as a pup, you’re unlikely to emerge the Alpha Dog in maturity. Right now, winning two matches in a pro tournament would be a great leap forward for Young, and that will make thinking even bigger not just a huge challenge, but an unrealistic expectation. Players find niches, which are amply demonstrated by the fact that so few of them emerge as stars in mid-or-even late career.

Young has admitted feeling some discomfort as a kid and newcomer on the pro tour, but that’s abating lately. He says, “It's a lot better. Guys are talking, you know. I'm talking. Sometimes you have to start the conversation. You can't always wait for someone to come up to you.”

And just who has come up to say hello?

“Pretty much all the American guys and a couple foreign guys, yeah.”

Advertising

2006_08_28_young_c

2006_08_28_young_c

I pressed, asking if he’d introduced himself to anyone. He replied:

Can't say I've walked up and introduced myself. I've said hello to quite a few of them, but not walked up and just introduced myself. . . The American guys obviously know (me). Some of the foreigners that were Juniors a couple years ago, I think they know. Like Monfils, he knows. They talk. I think some of them do know.

I couldn’t resist asking if he had ever gone up to Roger Federer to say, “Hi.”

“No,” he said, “But he actually will come up to me and give me a handshake and say hello. . . Yeah, just keep up the good work.”

Young is friendly with his American peers (budding pros like Scoville Jenkins and Phillip Simmonds); as well, Roddick, Paradorn Srichaphan, Justin Gimelstob, Todd Martin, Jim Courier, Paul Goldstein and John McEnroe have all been supportive of his career.

Mardy Fish fared better than Young, winning his match with Simon Gruel in a somewhat sloppy but occasionally brilliant four-set performance. Fish is older and wiser than Young, and more aware and articulate. While fielding questions about the struggles his generation (Roddick, Blake, Robby Ginepri, et al) has experienced living up to the standard set by the dynastic Sampras generation, he got to talking about his close friendship with Blake.

We live basically on the same street inTampa. We golf a lot inTampa . Down time is ?? it's nice to have a buddy that close 'cause I moved over from*Vero Beach* and not very many of my friends ?? they didn't come with me, obviously, at all. They're still there or in college or moved on. You know, so you kind of adopt new friends really. And guys that we were around all the time, like James and these guys. You know, James and I have become very close over the years. It's nice to have such a good guy so close. We both like the same things. We both love playing golf. We both love hanging out. Down time is definitely fun.**

So this got me thinking. The best thing to happen to Young right now would be for Blake and Fish to recruit him for their Tampa posse. I think Young could really benefit from that kind of mentoring, and I say that knowing full well how easy it is for someone like me to tell others what they should - and should not - be doing. But really, who wouldn’t love having Young as a kid brother, or at least a rookie, tag-a-long and perfect lab rat for every stupid practical joke you can think of trying?

It would be a terrific - as well as a very timely - thing for a couple of reasons, including the least pleasant one: There were signs on court today that Young really needs a dose of organic confidence that he’s unlikely to get from any other source, including coaches. Granted, Young complained about a sore left arm and a problem in one of his legs, but he often looked dispirited, frustrated, and unable to give himself entirely to the match. In short, he looked like a real kid out there, in stark contrast to the purposeful mien brought to the fray by Fish and his cohorts, including Blake and Roddick (who won big today, and felt and looked very solid doing it).

This is, of course, something you can’t expect others to do, even if you can’t do it yourself. And pro tennis is a jungle; it’s every man and woman for himself, and you’ve got to watch your back, even among friends.  But the real point I’m trying to make is that I can’t really see anything else (I know, let’s do some crosscourt-and-down-line drills! Okay, give me 25 curls with the 15-pounders!) having a career-altering affect on Young, and from what I saw today, he’s in need of some serious career-altering. It’s less because he’s losing matches than because of the way he’s losing matches.

At one point in his presser, I asked Young if he felt at all awed or intimidated when the pros that matter paid him some attention. He said:

“Really, don't know what to say really when they're coming at me. You're just in awe of them coming up, trying to say anything to you. You're kind of at a loss for words.”

Being at a loss for words is one thing, being at a loss for game, or attitude, is quite another. Young needs a big brother, it’s as simple – and difficult – as that.