2006_09_06_youzney

I could tell there was going to be trouble shortly after I arrived at Louis Armstrong by the way Rafael Nadal was hitting his forehand. You know how he sometimes looks like he's falling off a cliff, with his back to the abyss, as he hits his forehand? Well, Youzhny was backing him up and, placing his hand on Jet Boy's chest, giving him that last, polite shove. Bye,bye Rafa. . .

It was early in the fourth set, and already the signs for Nadal were bad. In fact, it was the kind of day when, if Nadal were any less of a grinder, he would have been in big trouble, instead of medium trouble: his penetration off the ground was very poor, which was allowing Youzhny to really step in (it's always a step up as well, at least mentally) and dictate. Jet Boy seemed unable to put together even two or three consecutive points in which he applied serious pressure and made Youzhny run - and hit on the run - more often and with greater alacrity than that with which he is comfortable.

Some of this was due to the level at which Youzhny was playing. His relatively flat game is tailor-made for beating a guy who plays with what the Europeans like to call "lift" (topspin), provided he can do at least two of these three things: take the ball early, make deep placements, and apply pressure by coming to the net often enough to peel off and neutralize the critical layer of peripheral vision that great retrievers and counterpunchers like Nadal so rely on when their neurological gatekeepers are crying out, Fire in the hole, fire in the hole. . . And that's something players like Nadal love to inflict, but are loath to experience.

This could get interesting, I thought, as Chris Clarey showed up and settled into the seat next to me.

It was early evening at the USTABJKNTC, the sky was the color of pewter, and the enormous, festively-colored scoreboard perched atop the stadium provided a striking contrast to the ponderous gray clouds behind it. When the lights come on over Louis Armstrong stadium to abet the fading light, the palette of colors representing the assembled spectators takes on a kind of glow, and you half expect the whole joint to lift off and go spinning back to a mother ship somewhere in outer space.

About halfway through the third set, Nadal had a resurgence, and he once again found his length and ability to shove Youzhny around. But he was unable to do it with his characteristic consistency. Youzhny wasn't giving an inch. This guy has had a reputation as a deadly if not entirely pulled together Grand Slam contender for about four years now, ever since he became a superstar in his native Russia by coming  back from two sets down in the fifth and decisive rubber of the Davis Cup final, securing Russia's first DC trophy with his electrifying win over Paul-Henri Mathieu.

Youzhny's game is clean as a whistle, and built on a versatile one-handed backhand and an exemplary, open-stance forehand. He seems to wrap the entire upper portion of his torso around the ball with each swing, but the real magic is in his legs, and watching him I think I figure out something that has eluded me for many years. Certain players (Jimmy Connors and Miloslav Mecir come to mind and, strangely enough, so does Lleyton Hewitt, albeit in a different way) can get from their legs (with an assist from the hips) what most of their peers get from their arms and shoulders. Somehow, they seem better able to tap into the power below their waist (often with less apparent effort, a la Mecir), which is partly due to exquisite timing and partly to the same kind of funky genetic anomaly that enables some white people to break dance.

Of this, Youzhny is a classic example. If you watch him hitting that forehand, you'll see that his knees are almost always bent (the opposite of, say, John McEnroe, and the equivalent of Boris Becker, serving),no matter how indisposed and under pressure he appears to be. And as he uncoils and meets the ball, Youzhny's legs leave the ground, even though he's in a semi-crouch (hey, how did he do that?), and rotate into the court, so he lands on both feet, square to the net at roughly the same time his shot whistles over the net.

All in, it's an incredibly crisp motion that satisfies with its one-two beat, all the parts in unison even if the upper and lower body seem to be traveling in different directions. It seems as impossible to me as I write this as it does to you as you read it. But that's sure how it looks to me.

Anyway, Chris observed that on these hard courts, Nadal's backhand appeared to be more deadly than his forehand. 'He hits it flatter," Chris said, just as Nadal tagged a monster forehand winner. "It's a more forceful rally shot."

I think that's accurate. Nadal's preparation for the backhand may be the most classic part of his game, and it absolutely shines in comparison with his odd, Hewitt-esque, service motion, which is really the only part of Nadal's stroking repertoire that looks forced and stiff, rather than explosive and natural. Nadal even sets his left foot with the toe pointing at the net, which is pure Bjorn Borg. But as good as that backhand is, and as much as it is his ultimate, defensive, point-ender, the forehand remains his offensive closer, if not his most persuasive rallying tool on hard courts.

Before long,a Long Island Railroad train tooted a few melancholy blasts to announce what appeared to be Youzhny's imminent demise as he fell behind, 5-6, 0-40 in the third - triple set-point. And what are the odds of getting out of that kind of jam, given Nadal's ability to play his best on big points?

As it turned out, Youzhny played a great game from that point on, serving well and attacking boldly, to  hold. Once he pulled himself up to a higher level, Youzhny apparently decided he liked the scenery and stayed there, and the men produced some of their best tennis. In the ensuing tiebreaker, Youzhny got one huge break: leading by 5-4, Nadal tagged a big forehand that looked a winner only to clip the net cord and fly out.

That proved to be key shot of the match. Youzhny won the next two points to take the 'breaker, and Nadal never looked the same again. After an easy hold to open the fourth set, Youzhny broke Nadal at love. Nadal looked utterly dispirited, and even the occasional fist clench looked half-hearted at best, as if he were engaging in a little nostalgia, or wishful thinking, rather than pumping himself up for the rest of the match.

Youzhny didn't hesitate to call this his best win ever, and it topped his epic Davis Cup in one, bittersweet way that made this match seem an excercise in deferred gratification:

For me, it was really tough time because three months before the Davis Cup, my father has died. He doing a lot for me and he cannot watch this match. And I cannot be glad. I be happy, but I cannot be happy for hundred percentage after this match because it was just three months after the father.

Advertising

2006_09_06_nadal

2006_09_06_nadal

Of course all country, we going to presidents', to one presidents, to former presidents. It was huge, huge for, you know. But for me, it was like I cannot feel the same would feel, I think, a lot of people in Russia. Of course after, when it was maybe one or two years ago, I understand what our team is doing for Davis Cup.

That's why for me, it's really tough to compete this match in Davis Cup. Actually for me was very tough time. I not was happy like I must be happy after this match, you know. If I win like one years before or now, it will be now another situation. But in this year it was really tough for me.

Going back to this issue of Nadal's forehand, Youzhny was reluctant to discuss his match strategy, but if you read between the lines it gets you pointed in the right direction:

You know, I tried to play ?? of course, against Nadal, is stupid to play only to his backhand, because you can play one, two balls to his backhand, and after he start to play his forehand because he is already in this corner. I don't want to tell you exactly...

No, really, because, you know, it may be not really correct to Rafa if I tell you I beat him because I play like this, I play like this. (How's that for class?)

If you see the match, maybe you see some shots where it was really tactics. Because the match, all match it was the same from first set until end of set. I didn't change the tactics. If I change tactics for one moment, I was (indiscernible), I think. I had only one chance to beat Rafa, I play like I play today.

Translation: Respect the forehand, but don't become a slave to avoiding it. The only way to keep Nadal from simply lining up and teeing on a succession of forehands is to open up the court and keep him moving and guessing - which of course is one reason Roger Federer, who has no fear of using the entire court, plays him so close.

Nadal is a bold and expressive young man, and the press conference he gave following the loss was telling. He looked crushed.Depending on how you look at it, he either has a child's callow inability to mask disappointment, or a child's unrepressed ability to articulate his vulnerability through the quiver of a lip, the clipped cadence of his speech, and a facility to form an expression that is so balanced on the fence between a grimace and a smile that it manages to wed the two clashing urges into the perfect confession.

He may be a captive of his youth, but for all the fist pumping, primal outbursts and leaping salmon impersonations, he is no prisoner of the raging competitor within. He has a mature and discreet understanding of competition and fair play, and in losing he was bathed in the aura of something I can only describe as the competitor's state of athletic grace. This is a condition that is conspicuously free of three of the most common ways that beaten players assault the notion of fair play: tight-lipped intransigence, misdirection (blaming the loss on conditions, or injury) and false humility.

Here are some excerpts from his presser:

Q. Why was it such a struggle to find a rhythm out there today? You've been able to play with a good rhythm throughout this tournament. Why the struggle today?

RAFAEL NADAL: I am not agree. But you think that, okay. Not really. Maybe I play my best match in New York here today,  my best tennis.

Youzhny was playing the unbelievable tennis, especially in the beginning. I have Love?40 in the third set, and in the most important moment I have 5?4, 0?40, one time in the third.

I was playing very, very good. For me, I was playing good, no? Not out of rhythm, no? Not out of the rhythm.

I am happy with my tennis, but I have ?? I was not playing with my best calm in the important moments in the points. I never say that, no, but, sure, today, I don't have the best of luck. Because if when you have Love?40 and 6?5 and 5?4 in the tiebreak, you touch the net and the ball go out for the baseline, so that's not the best of luck, no?

But that's it, no? I say congratulate to Mikhail. He was playing very, very good. I thought I was playing great, too. But after, I was not playing with the best calm in that moments.

Q. Did you have anything wrong with your ankle?

RAFAEL NADAL: It's okay. Is stupid now say anything about that, no? No, it's okay. I never ?? I don't want to speak never when I lose. If I win, I say anything about my ankle. But if I lose, that's as I lose, I lose. No ankle, no pain, nothing. I lose (smiling).

Q. It's true, it's normal (the ankle)?

RAFAEL NADAL: I lose. He play better than me.

At one point, somebody lobbed out this gem:

Q. Why do you think you didn't win today? Was it the service or what?

RAFAEL NADAL: Because I lose.

Came the follow-up: Why do you think you lost it today? The surface?

RAFAEL NADAL: Why the surface, no? Is good surface for me. He play very good tennis, and I was playing good, but I was... (Speaking Spanish).

THE MODERATOR: He didn't make the most of his chances. He didn't take his opportunities.

RAFAEL NADAL: That's it. Not gonna find the surfaces. That's it. The tennis is easy (smiling).

And Nadal had these partings words, in response to a question too long to paraphrase here:

Q. Andy Murray said earlier today after losing to Davydenko 6?Love in the fourth set, he said that he was very proud of his accomplishment in so much as he's a young man, he's 19 years old, you're 20, but that he was able to come here and exceed anything he did in the past. Like yourself, he said, I played my best tennis, what more could I do. Is that the way you feel? Are you proud of yourself and what you were able to do in the big picture in this tournament?

RAFAEL NADAL: Well, maybe is not the same situation, no? Is a different situations of the career. So Andy is playing good the last tournaments, is playing good in Toronto, was playing good in Cincinnati, play the final the tournament before Toronto. **

So for him is a good tournament, no? He played  ?? no, he played the fourth round here, no?

But, sure, the expectations, he's a young guy. His first year in the top positions. So the expectations is not the same for him than for me, no?

Sure, I am happy with my game because maybe I play not bad game today. But, sure, I cannot say I am very happy with my tournament. I lost in quarterfinals. I am the No. 2 in the world. So I lost with the last eight. If I am the No. 2, I play the final, no?

That's joke, but...

It's okay. I know was important chance for me. So I am happy. I improve my tennis here in New York . Is the first year I play better here. But, sure, I am disappointed, no? I need improve, no? My goal now is improve. I was playing not the best moment in the year the last three tournaments. I want improve my tennis.

I know today I play good tennis, but I want to improve. My special goal is next year in Australia no? So I want to improve. I have four months, and I gonna try my best. I gonna try improve every day, work hard every day.

'Dios, boy warrior, and may the road rise with you.